Home » The Origin of Blond Afros in Melanesia » Vanuatu calls on major polluters to back UN resolution clearing path for legal ruling on climate change

Vanuatu calls on major polluters to back UN resolution clearing path for legal ruling on climate change

Vanuatu’s Foreign Minister says it would be “embarrassing” for both China and the United States

by admin

By foreign affairs reporter Stephen Dziedzic, Posted 

Vanuatu’s Foreign Minister says it would be “embarrassing” for both China and the United States if they fail to back the Pacific Island nation’s push to get the International Court of Justice to issue a ruling on climate change.

The United Nations is expected to vote later this week on the landmark resolution which would ask the ICJ to rule on the international legal obligations states have to tackle the environmental crisis.

More than 100 nations have already agreed to co-sponsor the motion, including Australia.

Key points:

  • UN General Assembly expected to vote on Vanuatu’s resolution seeking ICJ ruling on climate change.
  • 100 nations are backing the motion, but China and the US yet to signal how they will vote.
  • Vanuatu’s Foreign Minister said it would be “embarrassing” if they oppose the motion.

But several major polluters – including both China and the United States – are yet to say if they’ll throw their weight behind it at the UN.

Jotham Napat said he pressed White House Asia tsar Kurt Campbell on the issue during his visit to Port Vila last week, but the Biden Administration was “reluctant to take a stand” on the vote.

Kurt Campbell speaking in Honiara.(ABC News)

Kurt Campbell speaking in Honiara.(ABC News)

He also indicated that China’s government had not yet responded to Vanuatu’s request that it back the resolution.

“We have made every attempt. I have written several letters to China through different discussions we have had simply asking if they could co-sponsor the resolution,” Mr Napat said.

The resolution will ask UN General Assembly to seek an opinion from the International Court of Justice on the international legal obligations that countries have to act on climate change.

The ruling will not be binding, but activists hope it will provide a new mechanism for climate action by making it clear what obligations states have to protect both the climate and the environment.

Australia has thrown its weight behind the push but has argued that the Court must consider the obligations of current and future emitters – not just those historically responsible for emissions – in order to be effective.

File: Vanuatu Foreign Minister Jotham Napat and his Australian counterpart Penny Wong. (DFAT)

File: Vanuatu Foreign Minister Jotham Napat and his Australian counterpart Penny Wong. (DFAT)

Mr Napat said a “good number” of nations were already backing Vanuatu’s resolution, but he hoped to reach a full consensus when the United Nations voted on it later this week.

“We are hoping that the China and the US will probably raise their hand to call for full (consensus) because it’s so embarrassing when you have some major players coming on board and giving their blessing” he said.

“We are hoping they do the right thing.”

He said major emitters had to acknowledge that small island states faced existential risks from climate change, back the ICJ resolution, and radically ramp up action to cut emissions.

“We are asking the US and China to consider his. It’s about our survival. It’s about the next generation.”

“We should not be greedy,” the Foreign Minister said.

Posted 27 Mar 2023

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?